Document

Still waters run deep: Community-based water management as a case for ethnofederalism in Afghanistan

About this Digital Document

This thesis explores how, for more than four millennia, neighboring Afghan tribal communities have exercised highly decentralized, community-based freshwater management practices. I argue that these practices can act as both a model for how to structure Afghan polity at large as well as a global lesson in environmental resource management. The staying-power of these highly decentralized institutions is especially confounding for US policymakers because despite enduring nearly three decades of unrelenting violent conflict, these community-based freshwater management practices have remained a bulwark against "modern" western capitalist expansionism. These management practices are exceptionally resilient because they draw their strength from the people-to-people relationships they create and because they place the decision-making power firmly in the hands of the community. These time-honored practices are under attack by economic intervention from western capitalists and the structural adjustment schemes needed for its entrenchment. Using these community-based freshwater management practices as a model for Afghanistan's political organization at large, I recommend ethnofederalism with consociational power sharing at the center because it fits Afghanistan's specific cultural and environmental considerations. The decentralized nature of this strategy also leaves the decision-making power firmly in the hands of the tribal communities.

Full Title
Still waters run deep: Community-based water management as a case for ethnofederalism in Afghanistan
Contributor(s)
Thesis advisor: Casagrande, David G.
Publisher
Lehigh University
Date Issued
2014-01
Language
English
Type
Genre
Form
electronic documents
Department name
Political Science
Digital Format
electronic documents
Media type
Creator role
Graduate Student
Identifier
877386725
https://asa.lib.lehigh.edu/Record/1397369
Subject (LCSH)

Citation


        
      
@mastersthesis{blaxland2014,
  title = {Still waters run deep: Community-based water management as a case for ethnofederalism in Afghanistan},
  author = {Blaxland, Joel},
  year = {2014},
  month = jan,
  publisher = {Lehigh University},
  url = {https://asa.lib.lehigh.edu/Record/1397369},
  keywords = {Afghanistan, community-based, consociation, ethnofederalism, Structural Adjustment, Water},
  abstract = {This thesis explores how, for more than four millennia, neighboring Afghan tribal communities have exercised highly decentralized, community-based freshwater management practices. I argue that these practices can act as both a model for how to structure Afghan polity at large as well as a global lesson in environmental resource management. The staying-power of these highly decentralized institutions is especially confounding for US policymakers because despite enduring nearly three decades of unrelenting violent conflict, these community-based freshwater management practices have remained a bulwark against "modern" western capitalist expansionism. These management practices are exceptionally resilient because they draw their strength from the people-to-people relationships they create and because they place the decision-making power firmly in the hands of the community. These time-honored practices are under attack by economic intervention from western capitalists and the structural adjustment schemes needed for its entrenchment. Using these community-based freshwater management practices as a model for Afghanistan's political organization at large, I recommend ethnofederalism with consociational power sharing at the center because it fits Afghanistan's specific cultural and environmental considerations. The decentralized nature of this strategy also leaves the decision-making power firmly in the hands of the tribal communities.},
  language = {English},
}